The Effect of Individual/Group Focused vs. Unfocused Feedback on EFL Learners’ Pragmatic Performance in terms of Accuracy and Fluency

Authors

  • Elahe Pordank Islamic Azad University
  • Mohammadreza Valizadeh Department of Translation and Interpretation (English), Faculty of Humanities, Cappadocia University, Cappadocia, Turkey

Keywords:

focused/unfocused corrective feedback, second language writing, accuracy, fluency, pragmatic competence, speech act of request

Abstract

This research investigated the feasible effects of individual/group focused versus unfocused feedback on EFL learners’ pragmatics achievements in terms of accuracy and fluency. To do this, 60 female intermediate level English students were divided into four experimental groups and asked to write request letter based on the instruction they had received. In order to check the homogeneity of the participants in terms of their level of proficiency, an Oxford Placement Test was administered. Afterwards, to estimate the participants’ speech act performance before the experiment in each group, a pre-test was used. During treatment sessions, the writings were corrected, individual/group focused and unfocused feedbacks were provided, and then they were handed back to the students to notice the errors. To assess the pragmatic knowledge of the participants regarding the speech act of request in each group after the treatment, a post-test was administered. To reach more reliable data, two raters corrected the participants’ responses on pretest and posttest. Two repeated-measures two-way ANOVA and MANOVA were used to analyse the data. The results indicated individual/group focused and unfocused group significantly benefited from the provision of feedback. Besides, limitations of the study and suggestions for further research are both addressed at the end of the paper.

References

Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 227–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00027-8

Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.

Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2013). Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 63(s1), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00738.x

Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004

Bitchener, J., East, M., & Cartner, H. (2010). The effectiveness of providing second language (L2) writers with on-line written corrective feedback. In Ako Aotearoa (pp. 1–12). Ako Aotearoa Publication. https://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/download/ng/file/group-5/the-effectiveness-of-providing-second-language-writers-with-on-line-written-corrective-feedback.pdf

Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge.

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 409–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089924

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback. System, 37(2), 322–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.12.006

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.002

Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001

Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/5.3.196

Bonilla López, M., Van Steendam, E., Speelman, D., & Buyse, K. (2018). The differential effects of comprehensive feedback forms in the second language writing class. Language Learning, 68(3), 813–850. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12295

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9

Coyle, Y., & Larios, J. R. De. (2014). Exploring the role played by error correction and models on children’s reported noticing and output production in a L2 writing task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(03), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000612

Crystal, D. (1997). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

DeKeyser, R. M. (1994). Implicit and explicit learning of second language grammar: A pilot study. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587210

Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 339–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060141

Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36(3), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001

Ferreira, A., Moore, J. D., & Mellish, C. (2007). A study of feedback strategies in foreign language classrooms and tutorials with implications for intelligent computer-assisted language learning systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 17(4), 389–422. https://www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/18502015/Ferreira_Moore_ET_AL_2008_A_Study_of_Feedback_Strategies_in_Foreign_Language_Classrooms_and_Tutorials_with_Implications_for_Intelligent_Computer_Assisted_Language_Learning_Systems.pdf

Ferris, D. R., Brown, J., Liu, H., & Stine, M. E. A. (2011). Responding to L2 writers in college writing classes: What teachers say and what they do. TESOL Quarterly, 45(2), 207–234. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.247706

Ferris, D. R., Liu, H., Sinha, A., & Senna, M. (2013). Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009

Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X

Furnborough, C., & Truman, M. (2009). Adult beginner distance language learner perceptions and use of assignment feedback. Distance Education, 30(3), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910903236544

Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2015). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 180–206). Routledge.

Guénette, D. (2007). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.01.001

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Kasper, G. (1997). The role of pragmatics in language teacher education. In K. Bardovi-Harlig & B. Hartford (Eds.), Beyond Methods: Components of second language teacher education (pp. 113–136). McGraw-Hill.

Kasper, G., & Blum-Kulka, S. (1993). Interlanguage pragmatics: An introduction. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 3–17). Oxford University Press.

Kepner, C. G. (1991). An experiment in the relationships of types of written feedback to the development of second language writing skills. Modern Language Journal, 75(3), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05359.x

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml029

Mackey, A. (2012). Input, interaction, and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford University Press.

Negari, G. M. (2011). A study on strategy instruction and EFL learners’ writing skill. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v1n2p299

Nia, Z. A., & Valizadeh, M. (2021). A comparison of the effects of revision-mediated and attention-mediated indirect coded feedback on EFL learners’ written syntactic accuracy. Shanlax Internatinal Journal of Education, 9(4), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.34293/ education.v9i4.4093

Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (5th. ed.). Open University Press.

Polio, C., Fleck, C., & Leder, N. (1998). “If only I had more time”: ESL learners’ changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(1), 43–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90005-4

Purnawarman, P. (2011). Impacts of different types of teacher corrective feedback in reducing grammatical errors on ESL/EFL students writing [Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University]. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/30067

Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129

Schmidt, R. W. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge University Press.

Semke, H. (1984). The effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17(3), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1984.tb01727.x

Sheen, Y. (2007a). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 255–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00059.x

Sheen, Y. (2007b). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitude on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition : a collection of empirical studies. Oxford University Press.

Sheen, Y. (2010). Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(02), 203–234. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990507

Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37(4), 556–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.09.002

Soltanpour, F., & Valizadeh, M. (2018a). Revision-mediated and attention-mediated feedback: Effects on EFL learrners’s written syntactic accuracy. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(4), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.4p.83

Soltanpour, F., & Valizadeh, M. (2018b). The effect of individualized technology-mediated feedback on EFL learners’ argumentative essays. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(3), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.3p.125

Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (2010). Second language acquisitin. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 108–123). Hodder Education.

Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x

Truscott, J. (1999). The case for “the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80124-6

Truscott, J. (2004). Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.05.002

Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.003

Truscott, J. (2009). Arguments and appearances: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 59–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.09.001

Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(4), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003

Valizadeh, M. (2020). The effect of comprehensive written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ written syntactic accuracy. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 11(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.11n.1p.17

Valizadeh, M. (2021). Revision vs. attention requirements: Impacts on the efficacy of the written indirect corrective feedback. Turkish Online Journal of English Language Teaching (TOJELT), 6(1), 25–43. http://www.tojelt.com/OncekiSayilarDetay.aspx?Sayi=2021/1

Van Beuningen, C. G. (2010). Corrective feedback in L2 writing: Theoretical perspectives, empirical insights, and future directions. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 1–27. http://revistas.um.es/ijes/article/view/119171

Van Beuningen, C. G., De Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning, 62(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00674.x

Vyatkina, N. (2010). The effectiveness of written corrective feedback in teaching beginning German. Foreign Language Annals, 43(4), 671–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2010.01108.x

Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H.-Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.

Zhang, X. (2017). Reading-writing integrated tasks, comprehensive corrective feedback, and EFL writing development. Language Teaching Research, 21(2), 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815623291

Downloads

Published

2022-05-29